Kerr (2007) also discusses in his blog post that the "-isms" are necessary to explain changes and that each -ism has a useful piece to it. "It seems to me that each _ism is offering something useful without any of them being complete or stand alone in their own right" (Kerr, 2007). I agree with this statement, if we could take the useful pieces from each theory and develop one effective theory that explained how we learn and how we process information these theories would be much more effective.
Karl Kapp (2007), discusses this same idea in his blog post "Out and About." He states that not one of theories one hundred percent explains how humans process information.
References
Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html
Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/
Rachel,
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I enjoyed reading your examples in relation to working out and seeing results or working hard at your job to receive a promotion. What happens, however, if you are that person that is busting your butt at work or the gym and you don't see results? What if you are constantly going above and beyond at work and never get promoted? How frustrating would that be!
Taking what works from each theory and applying it to where it is needed is what works best. Do you ever feel overwhelmed trying to make sure that you are doing what is best?
Yes I agree that it is often overwhelming trying to make sure I am doing what is best for every student. I just assess continually to see if they are improving. If not,I change what I am doing because obviously it isn't working!!
ReplyDelete